MINNESOTA FRAUDSTERS FACE DEPORTATION: $18 BILLION SCANDAL LINKED TO TERROR FUNDING TRIGGERS FEDERAL CRACKDOWN

MINNEAPOLIS — The massive “industrial-scale fraud” scandals currently rocking the state of Minnesota have transcended simple financial crime. As federal investigators track the flow of nearly $18 billion in misappropriated funds, a central, explosive question has reached the halls of Congress: Should individuals convicted of defrauding the government to potentially fund overseas terrorism be permanently removed from American soil?

Under current U.S. law, the path to deportation for such crimes is both legally clear and politically charged. The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to utilize every tool in the federal arsenal to ensure that those who stole from American taxpayers to fund enemies abroad never walk American streets again.

The Legal Hammer: 8 U.S.C. 1227

Federal immigration law is explicit regarding “security and related grounds.” Under 8 U.S.C. 1227, any alien—including green card holders—who has “engaged in, is engaged in, or at any time after admission engages in any terrorist activity” is deportable. Furthermore, providing “material support” for a designated terrorist organization (such as al-Shabaab) is a Tier 1 violation that triggers immediate removal proceedings.

While many of the defendants in the “Feeding Our Future” and housing fraud schemes are naturalized U.S. citizens, the law provides a pathway for removal through denaturalization. If the government can prove that an individual obtained their citizenship through fraud or willful misrepresentation—or if they become affiliated with a terrorist organization within five years of naturalization—their citizenship can be revoked, paving the way for a one-way flight.

The Terrorism Financing Link

In December 2025, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that federal agencies are actively tracking wire transfers from Minnesota to Somalia and the Middle East. While Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson recently stated that there is currently no direct evidence that defendants purposefully funded al-Shabaab, the possibility of “indirect support” remains under intense scrutiny.

Critics argue that when millions of dollars are funneled through informal “hawala” systems into terror-controlled territories, the intent becomes secondary to the result.

“If you steal from American children and that money ends up in the hands of al-Qaeda affiliates, you have forfeited your privilege to live under our flag,” one lawmaker argued during a recent fierce hearing on Capitol Hill.

A Community Betrayed

Within the Minnesota Somali community, the reaction is one of dual outrage. Many Somali Americans, who came to the U.S. to escape the very terror groups mentioned in these investigations, are the most vocal in calling for justice.

“These fraudsters have stained our community’s name,” one local leader stated. “We want the law enforced, but we fear collective punishment for the actions of a greedy few.”

The Final Decision

As the administration ramps up its deportation strategy, the focus on “security-related” removals is expected to intensify. For the fraudsters in the North Star State, the legal battle may not end with a prison sentence. For many, the final verdict could be the revocation of the American dream they exploited.

THE ULTIMATE HYPOCRISY: HILLARY CLINTON DEMANDS JAIL TIME FOR “MISINFORMATION” WHILE HER OWN “RUSSIA HOAX” LIES GO UNPUNISHED

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an interview that has redefined the word “irony,” twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC to demand that Americans who engage in “misinformation” face civil or even criminal charges.

The statement, delivered with the practiced gravity of a seasoned stateswoman, has ignited a firestorm of criticism from those who remember that Clinton herself was the primary architect of one of the largest disinformation campaigns in American history: the Russia Hoax.

The “Misinformation” Manifesto During the MSNBC segment, Clinton argued that the current legal framework is insufficient to deal with the spread of “propaganda” and “false narratives.” She suggested that to protect democracy, the government must move beyond mere fact-checking and begin imposing “civil and, in some cases, criminal penalties” on those who share what she deems to be misinformation.

“We need to have a better way of holding people accountable,” Clinton stated. “If they are intentionally spreading lies that destabilize our country, there must be a price to pay.”

The Steele Dossier: A Million-Dollar Lie The immediate reaction from legal experts and political opponents was a swift reminder of the 2016 campaign. It is now a matter of public record that the Clinton campaign and the DNC funded the “Steele Dossier”—a collection of salacious and entirely debunked allegations of Trump-Russia collusion.

The campaign funneled money through a law firm to hide the payments, eventually resulting in an $8,000 fine for the Clinton campaign and a $105,000 fine for the DNC from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for mislabeling the spending as “legal services.”

“Hillary Clinton is calling for criminal charges for the exact thing she perfected,” said one commentator. “She paid for a fake dossier, pushed the Alfa Bank lie, and sat back while the country was torn apart by years of investigations based on her own fabrications.”

The Alfa Bank “Red Herring” Beyond the dossier, Clinton personally promoted the narrative of a “secret communications channel” between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank—a claim that the FBI and Special Counsel John Durham later confirmed was a complete fabrication. Durham’s investigation revealed that the Clinton campaign’s own tech experts had identified the data as a “red herring” weeks before Hillary tweeted it out as “evidence.”

A Dangerous Precedent Critics argue that Clinton’s call for criminalizing speech is not just hypocritical, but a direct assault on the First Amendment. By her own proposed standard, many argue that Hillary Clinton should be the first person to face a jury. Her campaign’s “disinformation” cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars in investigation costs and fueled years of national division.

As the hashtag #HillarysHoax trends globally, the question remains: Does the “Queen of Disinformation” truly want to live in a world where spreading false political narratives is a crime? Because if she does, she might find the courtroom a lot less friendly than the MSNBC studio.