WASHINGTON D.C. — The simmering tension over identity politics in Congress exploded into a legislative war today after Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) made a controversial statement attacking the historical demographic identity of the United States.
In a panel discussion that has since gone viral, Omar stated: “The idea that America is a White nation that must be preserved is disgusting.”
While Omar’s supporters framed the comment as a critique of white supremacy, Republicans viewed it as a direct attack on the country’s founding, its history, and a large swath of its citizenry.
The “Eviction Notice”
Representative Randy Fine (R-FL), who has been leading the charge to “Clean House,” did not waste time with a press release. Within hours of the comment, he walked onto the House floor and formally filed a
Resolution for Expulsion, effectively serving Omar with a legislative eviction notice.
Fine’s response was visceral and cut straight to the core of the “ungrateful” narrative that has plagued Omar.
“The Congresswoman calls the heritage of this nation ‘disgusting,’” Fine declared from the podium, holding up her quote. “Let me be clear: The only thing disgusting here is your ingratitude.”
“You Sit in Their Building”
Fine continued, delivering a brutal deconstruction of Omar’s position.
“You sit in a building built by the people you hate. You are paid by the taxes of the people you hate. You enjoy freedoms written into law by the people you hate. And now you have the audacity to call their history ‘disgusting’?”
He then pointed to the resolution on his desk.
“If the foundational identity of this nation is so repulsive to you, then you have no business writing its laws. This isn’t just a resolution; it’s an eviction notice. If you hate the host, it’s time to leave the house.”
The Fallout
Fine’s move marks a significant escalation. By framing Omar’s comments not as “political discourse” but as “hostility toward the American people,” Republicans are forcing a vote on whether a sitting member of Congress can openly express disdain for the nation’s majority demographic and history without consequence.
As the resolution heads to committee, the message from the GOP is undeniable: The days of tolerating anti-American rhetoric under the guise of “progress” are over.
Schiff’s Betrayal: Senator Threatens U.S. Troops with “War Crimes” Charges for Fighting Cartels
WASHINGTON — In a desperate attempt to sabotage President Trump’s “Maximum Pressure” campaign against deadly drug cartels, Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) has launched a new line of attack—not against the White House, but directly against the men and women in uniform.
In a stunning statement that critics are calling a psychological operation against American forces, Schiff warned that service members obeying orders to destroy narco-terrorist vessels could face “legal harm” and potential prosecution for
“war crimes.”
“These actions expose our service members to physical harm—it also exposes these service members to legal harm, to legal exposure,” Schiff declared.
Instilling Fear in the Ranks
Conservatives argue this is a calculated tactic of fear-mongering. Unable to stop the President’s agenda through legislative means, Schiff appears to be trying to paralyze the military chain of command by threatening soldiers with future imprisonment.
By dangling the threat of “legal exposure”—a dog whistle for international tribunals or politically motivated prosecutions—Schiff is telling American pilots and sailors to hesitate before pulling the trigger on the very criminals pumping fentanyl into U.S. neighborhoods.
“Senator Schiff is trying to instill fear into our military,” noted one defense analyst. “He wants a sailor in the Caribbean to worry more about a lawyer in Washington than the mission at hand. It is a disgraceful way to undermine national security.”
Protecting Cartels or Americans?
The contrast could not be starker. The Trump administration and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have designated these cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, recognizing that their chemical warfare against the American populace requires a military response.
Yet, Adam Schiff—the same man who spent years peddling debunked theories about Russia—now seems more concerned with the “legal rights” of drug lords than the safety of American citizens. To the radical Left, enforcing the border and destroying cartel infrastructure is a crime; allowing the free flow of deadly drugs is apparently “human rights.”
The Bottom Line
The American military is tasked with defending the homeland. They deserve the full backing of their government, not threats from their own Senators.
If Adam Schiff is worried about “crimes,” perhaps he should look at the body count in American cities caused by the cartels he is so eager to shield, rather than attacking the heroes sent to stop them.
