WASHINGTON — The simmering tension between the “Squad” and conservative hardliners has erupted into a full-blown political war. Representative Randy Fine has issued what he describes as a “deportation order” against Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) following her incendiary comments regarding the demographic and cultural history of the United States.

The confrontation began when Omar, known for her outspoken progressive views, attacked the notion of American heritage being tied to European ancestry.

“The Idea is Disgusting”

In a clip that has since circulated widely across conservative media, Omar rejected the concept of preserving a specific American identity.

“The idea that America is a White nation that must be preserved is disgusting,” Omar declared. She argued that such rhetoric is rooted in supremacy and exclusion, rather than the multicultural reality of the country.

For her supporters, it was a necessary critique of white nationalism. For her detractors, it was a rejection of the nation’s founding population and history.

The “Deportation Order”

Representative Randy Fine, never one to shy away from controversy, wasted no time in delivering a blistering counter-attack. Instead of simply debating the point, Fine escalated the rhetoric to the maximum level, calling for Omar’s removal from the country.

“If you find the country that gave you refuge so disgusting, you are free to leave,” Fine stated, effectively issuing a rhetorical deportation order. “In fact, we should help you pack. You don’t get to enjoy the freedoms of this nation while spitting on the people who built it.”

Fine’s response taps into a growing sentiment among the MAGA base that critics of America’s foundational culture should not hold positions of power within its government.

A Clash of Visions

This exchange highlights the irreconcilable divide in modern American politics. On one side, Omar represents the view that America must fundamentally transform and shed its “colonial” past. On the other, Fine represents the faction that views such transformation as an act of hostility and ingratitude.

Legal experts note that a “deportation order” from a fellow Representative carries no legal weight, as Omar is a U.S. citizen. However, the political weight is undeniable. By invoking deportation, Fine is signaling that for a segment of the GOP, the battle is no longer just about policy—it is about who has the right to call themselves an American.

As the clip of Omar’s “disgusting” comment continues to rack up millions of views, Fine’s “deportation” retort is becoming a rallying cry for a Republican party increasingly willing to play hardball.

“I DON’T ASPIRE TO BE HUMBLE”: KAMALA HARRIS BLASTS “SEXIST” CRITICS OF HER CACKLE, CALLS STANDARDS “OUT-OF-TOUCH”

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Former Vice President Kamala Harris is firing back at what she describes as a “persistent and sexist” obsession with her distinctive laughter. In a recent appearance on the Rich Little Broke Girls podcast, Harris tackled the criticism head-on, framing the mockery of her “cackle” as a symptom of “out-of-touch standards” placed exclusively on powerful women.

The discussion quickly moved beyond a simple defense of her personality, evolving into a broader critique of gender expectations in 2025 America.

“Humility is a Dated Perspective” When asked by the host about reporters and opponents who frequently cite her lack of traditional humility as a flaw, Harris didn’t mince words.

“I don’t aspire to be humble,” Harris declared, a line that immediately went viral. While acknowledging that humility has its place, she argued that it is often weaponized to keep women from occupying space. “It’s a very dated perspective on who women should be. To say women should be humble. Women should be quiet. Women should laugh quietly.”

She continued by challenging the notion that women in leadership should be “unburdened” by their own joy. “Women should not have a sense of humor. Women should not raise their voice. I have never felt burdened by those very dated and, I think, out-of-touch standards.”

The “Mother’s Laugh” Defense Harris has previously linked her laughter to her heritage and family, a point she reiterated during the podcast. She described growing up around a “bunch of women who laughed from the belly,” particularly her mother. By labeling her laughter as “sexist” to mock, Harris is positioning her detractors not just as political opponents, but as enemies of modern female expression.

Critics, however, were quick to pounce. Conservative commentators argued that the critique of her laugh isn’t about gender, but about “authenticity” and “timing,” often pointing to instances where the former VP laughed while discussing serious topics like border security or inflation.

A Litmus Test for 2028? Political analysts suggest that Harris’s refusal to “shrink herself” or adopt a more traditional, subdued persona is a calculated move as she navigates her post-VP career and a potential 2028 run. By leaning into the “humble-free” brand, she is signaling to her base that she will not be policed by the “MAGA standards” of her opponents.

As the 2025 culture wars intensify, Harris seems determined to turn one of her most-mocked traits into a badge of feminist defiance. For Kamala Harris, the laughter isn’t going anywhere—and she isn’t apologizing for the volume.