He didn’t hesitate for long and made another decision! Donald Trump has signed the order pssss
He didn’t hesitate for long and made another decision! Donald Trump has signed the order
In a recent move to combat anti-Semitism, former U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order that has significant implications for foreign students and individuals involved in pro-Palestinian protests. This order authorizes the deportation of international students who participate in demonstrations perceived as anti-Israel, aligning with the administration’s broader strategy to address campus activities deemed supportive of organizations like Hamas.
The executive order, signed in late January 2025, directs federal agencies to identify and potentially revoke the visas of non-citizen students involved in such protests. The administration justifies this action by referencing immigration laws that permit deportation of non-citizens who “endorse or espouse” terrorist organizations, with Hamas being designated as such by the U.S. since 1997.
Critics argue that this policy conflates legitimate political expression with support for terrorism, potentially infringing upon free speech rights. Legal experts and civil rights groups warn that using immigration enforcement to suppress protected speech could be unconstitutional and may lead to overreach by law enforcement.
In response to the executive order, some university alumni groups have taken proactive measures. For instance, an alumni group from Columbia University has reportedly discussed efforts to identify students involved in pro-Palestinian protests, aiming to facilitate their deportation.
This development has sparked a broader debate about the balance between combating anti-Semitism and preserving free speech on college campuses. As the Justice Department moves to implement the executive order, educational institutions and civil rights advocates are closely monitoring its impact on student activism and international student communities across the nation.
Sunny Hostin’s Life in Ruins After Husband’s $450M RICO Arrest — Marriage, Fortune, and Reputation on the Brink
Nobody saw this coming. Sunny Hostin — the outspoken co-host of
The View , a woman who built her brand on ethics, justice, and relentless accountability — is suddenly silent. Why? Because her husband, respected orthopedic surgeon Dr. Emanuel Hostin, has just been dragged into one of the largest RICO fraud cases in New York’s history, accused of orchestrating a $450 million medical scam that could leave their family in shambles.
The scandal is so explosive it has the potential to not only
bankrupt their household but also completely dismantle Sunny’s carefully crafted public image. For years, she sat at The View’s table preaching morality, holding politicians and celebrities to account. Now the spotlight has swung back on her, and the silence is deafening.
The Lawsuit That Changed Everything
At the center of the storm is a sweeping federal lawsuit that alleges Dr. Hostin was involved in a massive healthcare fraud ring — one so vast that nearly
200 defendants are named.
According to court filings, Dr. Hostin allegedly performed unnecessary surgeries on taxi and rideshare drivers, billing insurance companies for procedures that didn’t need to happen, all while allegedly raking in kickbacks.
For the insurance industry — often painted as villains — the tables have turned. Companies claim they were defrauded of hundreds of millions. And in a bitter twist, the victims weren’t faceless corporations alone; many were vulnerable immigrant workers, allegedly exploited for financial gain.
The accusations hit harder because they collide head-on with Sunny’s persona. She has always been the voice of morality and social justice. Yet here she is, forced to reckon with the possibility that her own household benefited from the very exploitation she has spent years condemning.
The Public Persona vs. Private Reality
For Sunny, this case is more than a headline. It is a nightmare that cuts at her credibility. The contrast is glaring:
-
On TV, she champions accountability.
-
At home, her husband is accused of one of the most audacious fraud schemes in New York’s medical history.
Her critics are circling like vultures. “Where is her outrage now?” they ask. “Why is she silent when accountability lands at her own doorstep?”
Every appearance she makes on The View is now overshadowed by whispers. Audience members aren’t just listening to her political takes — they’re wondering how much she knew, and whether she is, at this very moment, rehearsing damage control rather than commentary.
A RICO Case Bigger Than the Mafia
The scale of the case is staggering. Prosecutors describe it as larger in scope than some of New York’s most notorious mafia investigations.
Dr. Hostin is just one among many doctors accused of running up fake medical bills, but his profile — and his wife’s fame — have thrust him to the front of the scandal.
Sources say the fraud targeted working-class drivers who were desperate after car accidents. Many trusted the doctors, only to be steered into unnecessary surgeries allegedly designed to extract maximum insurance payouts.
The ethical breach here is chilling. It’s not just fraud; it’s playing with people’s health for profit. And that is what makes this case resonate beyond the courtroom — it strikes at the very trust people place in the medical system.
Sunny’s Silence Speaks Volumes
So far, Sunny has said almost nothing. That silence is being interpreted in two ways:
-
As loyalty — standing by her husband as the legal machine rolls forward.
-
As hypocrisy — dodging accountability in the very arena she has built her career on.
Her absence of comment is particularly jarring because Sunny has never been shy about calling out others. Whether it was politicians, celebrities, or corporate scandals, she has always been one of the first to raise her voice.
Now, as her husband faces charges that could send him behind bars and wipe out their fortune, her silence is almost louder than any statement she could make.
The Legal Defense and High Stakes
Dr. Hostin isn’t going down without a fight. His legal team, reportedly led by high-profile attorney Mark Geragos, is already framing the case as an insurance industry vendetta. They claim the lawsuit is less about fraud and more about insurance companies trying to claw back money to save their bottom line.
But the stakes are immense. If convicted, Dr. Hostin could face not only prison time but also financial ruin. That would leave Sunny, who has built her identity on her integrity and her career at ABC, facing the fallout of both
a destroyed marriage and a tainted reputation.
A Collapse in Real Time
Behind the polished daytime TV smile, insiders say Sunny’s personal life is unraveling. The pressure of the lawsuit has already strained her marriage, with whispers of separation growing louder by the day.
What does one do when their partner — the person they trusted with their life — is accused of betrayal at such a scale? For Sunny, the answer might come not in public statements but in the slow collapse of her private world.
Memoirs, courtroom drama, and the relentless pressure of media scrutiny often collide in the lives of public figures. And in this case, the storm isn’t passing anytime soon.
Bigger Than Just One Family
This scandal isn’t only about Sunny and Emanuel Hostin. It’s a mirror reflecting deeper flaws in America’s healthcare system, where profit often overshadows patient care.
Doctors, insurance companies, hospitals, and vulnerable patients are all caught in a web where accountability is rare and consequences are often borne by the least powerful.
-
Incoming NYC Mayor Mamdani Signals Resistance to Federal Immigration Enforcement, Setting Stage for Potential Clash
A new political and legal conflict may be unfolding in New York City as Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani prepares to take office on January 1. In recent public remarks, Mamdani has made clear that he intends to challenge federal immigration enforcement policies he views as excessive or unjust — a stance that could place New York City on a collision course with the federal government. His comments come at a time when federal authorities have increased immigration-related operations across several major cities, triggering both support and concern among local leaders.
The latest tension was amplified after New York City Councilman Shaun Abreu posted a video showing federal Homeland Security agents detaining a man in Washington Heights. The footage — brief and without full context — circulated widely online and quickly drew criticism from some local officials. Abreu described the arrest as “deeply disturbing” and raised concerns about whether the individual was afforded proper due process.
However, subsequent reporting, including court records, clarified that the man taken into custody — identified as Alpha Amadou Diallo — had previously undergone immigration proceedings. Diallo entered the United States illegally in 2021 and was ordered removed by a Biden-era immigration judge in 2024. Federal authorities stated that his case was not a surprise enforcement action but part of a legally authorized removal order already on record.
This clarification did not diminish broader concerns among some New York City leaders who fear that expanding federal operations could create fear within immigrant communities or undermine local authority. But it did bring renewed attention to the complex relationship between immigration enforcement and municipal governance — a relationship that often becomes strained during times of heightened political pressure.
Mayor-Elect Mamdani’s Position: Firm Opposition on Principle
Tyler Robinson’s Courtroom CONFESSION: Rival Party HIRED Him to KILL Charlie Kirk—The Nation SH0CKED!
Chip Roy Exposes Muslim Brotherhood’s Infiltration Of Red States psss
Chip Roy Exposes Muslim Brotherhood’s Infiltration Of Red States
Texas firebrand Rep. Chip Roy is leading a new Republican push to deport Sharia-law followers from the United States and crack down on radical groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood.
“America is facing an existential threat — the spread of Sharia Law,” Roy warned in a blistering statement. “From Texas to every state in the union, instances of Sharia Law adherents have threatened the American way of life, seeking to replace our legal system and Constitution with an incompatible ideology that diminishes the rights of women, children, and individuals of different faiths.”
Roy, who’s also running for Texas attorney general, said Europe’s experience with radical Islamist enclaves should serve as a warning to the U.S.
“Europe should be a wakeup call to America, showing what the spread of Sharia law looks like — the erosion of the West,” Roy said. “America’s immigration system must be fortified to counter the importation of Sharia adherents — the preservation of our constitutional republic and its people depend on it.”
The measure would direct top federal officials — including the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the Attorney General — to “deny any immigration benefit, visa, immigration relief, or admission to the United States to any alien who adheres to Sharia law.”
Congressman Chip Roy (R) speaks during House Judiciary Committee field hearing on New York City violent crimes at Javits Federal Building in New York City on April 17, 2023
It also mandates that any foreign national found to be a Sharia-law adherent “shall have any immigration benefit, immigration relief, or visa revoked, be considered inadmissible or deportable, and shall be removed from the United States.”
Those who lie about their adherence to Sharia law would face the same punishment, according to the bill.
Roy’s measure has quickly gained traction among House conservatives. Original cosponsors include Reps. Randy Fine of Florida, Tim Burchett of Tennessee, and Keith Self of Texas.
Roy also introduced the No Tax-Exemptions for Terror Act, legislation that would eliminate the tax-exempt status for extremist groups with close ties to terrorist organizations, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Brotherhood.
“It is absurd that the U.S. has provided organizations with ties to terrorism tax-exempt status in the U.S. – resulting in the American people inadvertently subsidizing terror against themselves. It is ridiculous, and we should have ended this long ago,” Roy said earlier this month.
Trump’s Kate Middleton Remarks Ignite International Debate Over Royal Protocol
Trump’s Kate Middleton Remarks Ignite International Debate Over Royal Protocol
A state dinner intended to strengthen US-UK diplomatic ties has instead become the center of a global controversy, as comments made by President Donald Trump about Princess Catherine have sparked intense criticism and reignited debates about presidential behavior on the international stage.
What was meant to be a historic celebration of the special relationship between two nations has become overshadowed by accusations of inappropriate conduct and breaches of centuries-old royal protocol that govern interactions with the British monarchy.
The Historic Setting and Unprecedented Honor
President Trump’s second state visit to the United Kingdom represents an extraordinary diplomatic milestone. Trump is currently on his second state visit to the UK – an unprecedented event for a president as most only have one. This rare honor places Trump in an exclusive category, as he becomes the first elected political leader in modern times to receive two formal state visits from the British monarchy.
The state dinner on September 17 was hosted by senior members of the royal family including King Charles, Queen Camilla, the Prince of Wales William, and Kate Middleton. The lavish event at Windsor Castle brought together 160 guests, including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, technology leaders, and diplomatic officials from both nations.
The evening was designed to showcase the pomp and pageantry that Britain is renowned for, with the royal family pulling out all the stops to honor the American president. The banquet featured a specially created cocktail called the “Transatlantic Whisky Sour,” blending Johnnie Walker Black with marmalade, topped with pecan foam and garnished with a toasted marshmallow. Personal touches included serving Hennessy 1912 Cognac Grande Champagne from Trump’s mother’s birth year, acknowledging his Scottish heritage.
The Comments That Sparked Controversy
Standing beside King Charles III and reading from prepared notes, Trump delivered remarks that would quickly become the focus of international attention. Trump said: “I just wanna say that His Majesty has also raised a remarkable son in His Royal Highness Prince of Wales, really amazing. Really amazing, we’ve gotten to know you and I think you’re going to have an unbelievable success in future.”
He continued: “Melania and I are delighted to visit again with Prince William, and to see her Royal Highness Princess Catherine.” Trump then turned to Kate, saying: “So radiant and so healthy, so beautiful, it’s a really great honour, thank you.”
The reference to Catherine being “healthy” carried particular significance given her recent cancer journey. Kate publicly confirmed her diagnosis in March 2024, and in January 2025 announced the good news that after undergoing treatment she was in remission.
While supporters viewed the comments as genuine warmth and acknowledgment of Catherine’s recovery, critics saw them as inappropriate for the formal diplomatic setting and a breach of royal protocol.
The Social Media Storm Erupts
The reaction on social media was swift and largely negative, with users criticizing both the content and tone of Trump’s remarks. “He needs to quit talking about how beautiful the Princess of Wales is,” wrote one critic. “It is wildly inappropriate. Its good to see you looking healthy. That’s it full stop.”
Another user expressed their discomfort more dramatically: “Radiant, healthy, and beautiful made me cringe so hard I broke teeth.” The visceral nature of some reactions highlighted how deeply Trump’s words had affected royal watchers and protocol observers.
Social media users also noted King Charles’s reaction, with one observer writing: “Charles literally laughed at his remarks to Catherine.” Video footage of the king’s response became part of the broader discussion about how the royal family handled Trump’s unconventional approach to diplomatic etiquette.
Some critics connected Trump’s comments to broader patterns of protocol violations. “Every time he opens his mouth he makes it worse and breakers more protocol,” one user complained. “How do I know these rules and he doesn’t? Completely incompetent, look at the Kings face, he knows he [is] inexcusable.”
A Pattern of Protocol Breaches
The controversy extends beyond just the dinner speech. As soon as the president stepped off Marine One, he shook Middleton’s hand and said, “You’re beautiful, so beautiful.” This immediate focus on Catherine’s appearance set the tone for what would become a day filled with protocol questions.
Royal experts noted that it’s not necessarily against royal protocol to compliment a member of the British royal family. However, remarks are usually more along the lines of appreciating their outfit. Trump’s direct comments about Catherine’s physical appearance were seen by many as crossing traditional diplomatic boundaries.
On his previous state visit Trump was criticised when he walked in front of the late Queen Elizabeth II, a breach of royal etiquette. This established pattern of protocol violations has made his current visit’s controversies seem less like isolated incidents and more like a consistent approach to royal interactions.
Additional protocol concerns emerged throughout the day. Donald Trump was criticized on social media for tucking in Princess Kate’s chair during the State Banquet at Windsor Castle. As Kate sat down, there was a man behind ready to tuck in her chair but Trump also leaned over to help. A clip of this moment went viral, viewed 217,000 times, with critics posting messages like “Ew, don’t touch her chair.”
The Harry Speculation and Royal Dynamics
Many took to social media to criticise Trump’s tone in the speech, which some also took as a subtle dig at Prince Harry by only mentioning ‘one son’. This interpretation added another layer to the controversy, suggesting that Trump’s comments may have carried diplomatic undertones regarding the royal family’s internal dynamics.
The speculation about Prince Harry references highlighted how every word of Trump’s speech was being analyzed for deeper meaning. Royal commentators noted that the careful phrasing in diplomatic speeches is typically designed to avoid any appearance of taking sides in family matters or making political statements about royal relationships.
Body Language and Physical Interactions Under Scrutiny
Beyond verbal comments, Trump’s physical interactions with the royal family drew criticism. After footage of Trump’s initial meeting with Kate was shared on social media, a number of onlookers had their eyes drawn to the pair’s handshake. Trump appeared to shake Kate’s hand with some serious vigour.
In the clip, the American instigates the greeting, going on to pull the mother-of-three somewhat towards him, either intentionally or inadvertently breaking major protocol. Royal protocol typically calls for gentle, respectful greetings, and the vigorous nature of Trump’s handshake style, which he’s known for in American politics, was seen as inappropriate for royal interactions.
Traditional royal greetings involve more formal approaches. Royal fans weighed in on the greeting in the comments, noting that it’s customary to give royal family members a slight bow or curtsy instead of shaking hands. Comments included questions like “Why didn’t the President bow in front of the king?” and observations about Trump’s tendency to pull people toward him during handshakes.
International Diplomatic Implications
The controversy has raised broader questions about how American presidents should conduct themselves during state visits. Trump’s unconventional style, which plays well with his domestic political base, has consistently created tension in formal diplomatic settings where centuries of protocol govern interactions.
British officials have historically been diplomatic in their public responses to Trump’s protocol breaches, but private reactions have often been less forgiving. The challenge for UK diplomats is balancing the need to maintain the special relationship with America while preserving the dignity and traditions of the monarchy.
The timing of these controversies is particularly sensitive given ongoing negotiations between the US and UK on trade deals and international policy coordination. British officials had hoped that the pomp and pageantry of the state visit would help smooth diplomatic relations and create a positive atmosphere for policy discussions.
Defending the President’s Approach
Not all reactions to Trump’s behavior have been negative. Supporters argue that his warmth and direct communication style represent authentic American values and that his comments about Catherine’s health showed genuine human concern for her cancer recovery.
Some commentators suggested that Trump’s focus on Catherine’s appearance and health, while perhaps not traditionally diplomatic, reflected sincere admiration and relief at her recovery from cancer. From this perspective, his comments were seen as heartfelt rather than inappropriate.
American supporters of the president have also argued that rigid royal protocol is outdated and that Trump’s more casual approach brings a refreshing informality to stuffy diplomatic traditions. This view sees his behavior as democratically American rather than disrespectfully inappropriate.
The Royal Family’s Professional Response
Despite the social media storm, the royal family maintained their characteristic professional composure throughout the visit. Catherine was seen smiling and engaging positively with both Trump and First Lady Melania throughout the various events, demonstrating the royal family’s ability to navigate challenging diplomatic situations with grace.
The seating arrangement at the state dinner placed Trump between King Charles and Princess Catherine, a position of high honor that demonstrated the royal family’s commitment to the diplomatic relationship despite any personal reservations about protocol breaches.
King Charles’s response to Trump’s speech, while noted by critics as potentially dismissive, could equally be interpreted as diplomatic politeness in the face of unconventional remarks. The king’s ability to maintain ceremonial dignity while accommodating Trump’s style showcased the monarchy’s diplomatic skills.
Cultural Differences and Diplomatic Challenges
The controversy highlights fundamental differences between American and British approaches to formality and protocol. American political culture often rewards directness and personal warmth, while British royal protocol emphasizes restraint and formal courtesy.
These cultural differences create ongoing challenges for US-UK diplomatic relations, particularly when American presidents bring their domestic communication styles to international settings. The balance between authentic expression and diplomatic appropriateness remains a constant tension in international relations.
For the British royal family, hosting Trump represents a unique challenge in maintaining their traditional role while adapting to different cultural approaches to diplomacy. Their success in managing these visits while preserving royal dignity demonstrates their continued relevance in modern international relations.
Global Media Coverage and Analysis
International media coverage of the controversy has varied significantly based on national perspectives and political orientations. British media has generally been more critical of protocol breaches, while American conservative outlets have been more supportive of Trump’s approach.
The global nature of the coverage demonstrates how royal protocol and American presidential behavior have become subjects of international interest and debate. Social media has amplified these discussions, allowing millions of people worldwide to weigh in on diplomatic etiquette and appropriate presidential behavior.
Royal commentators and protocol experts have used the controversy to educate broader audiences about the historical significance of royal protocol and why these traditions matter in diplomatic contexts.
Looking Forward: Diplomatic Relations and Future Visits
Despite the controversy surrounding Trump’s comments and behavior, the state visit achieved its primary diplomatic objectives. Trade discussions continued as planned, and both nations reaffirmed their commitment to the special relationship that has defined US-UK relations for decades.
The question remains whether future American presidents will learn from these protocol controversies or whether the informal American approach to diplomacy will continue to clash with traditional royal expectations. The evolution of diplomatic protocol in an increasingly informal world remains an ongoing challenge for international relations.
For the royal family, managing Trump’s unconventional approach while maintaining their own dignity and traditions has demonstrated their continued ability to adapt to changing diplomatic realities while preserving essential elements of royal protocol.
The Trump-Catherine interaction controversy ultimately reflects broader questions about tradition versus modernity, formality versus authenticity, and the challenge of maintaining diplomatic relationships across cultural and stylistic differences. As international relations continue to evolve, the balance between respect for tradition and accommodation of different approaches will remain a central diplomatic challenge.
The lasting impact of this controversy may be less about Trump’s specific comments and more about how it illuminates the ongoing tension between different cultural approaches to diplomacy and the challenge of maintaining international relationships in an era of changing expectations and communication styles.
DOJ Launches ‘Strike Force’ to Investigate Declassified Russiagate Evidence from Obama Era
The U.S. Department of Justice has announced the creation of a specialized “strike force” to investigate newly declassified intelligence records related to the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, following explosive disclosures made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
The decision comes after Gabbard released a cache of previously classified documents that she claims reveal how top Obama-era officials allegedly manipulated intelligence to support a narrative that Donald Trump colluded with Russian agents during the 2016 presidential election.
According to a DOJ spokesperson, the strike force—comprised of veteran investigators and federal prosecutors—has been tasked with reviewing all available evidence to determine whether laws were broken and if prosecutions are warranted. The department emphasized that the issue is being treated with “the utmost seriousness.”
“The Department of Justice is proud to work alongside Director Gabbard in pursuit of truth and accountability,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi. “We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.”
Insiders say the DOJ’s National Security Division will likely lead the probe, with possible coordination from multiple federal agencies.
The formation of the strike force follows a growing list of developments involving the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released in 2017. That report concluded that Russia interfered in the election to benefit Trump, but a recent internal review raised red flags about the way the assessment was compiled—highlighting rushed timelines, procedural deviations, and questionable intelligence sourcing.
Earlier this month, CIA Director John Ratcliffe submitted a criminal referral to the FBI regarding former CIA Director John Brennan’s role in shaping the ICA. That move added further momentum to calls for a comprehensive review of the intelligence process that set off the years-long Trump-Russia investigation.
Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman and now the Director of National Intelligence, has insisted that her office will continue releasing unclassified records related to the matter and will fully cooperate with the DOJ’s probe.
“This is not about party lines—it’s about restoring faith in our institutions and holding those in power accountable when they misuse that power,” Gabbard said during a recent Fox News interview.
The strike force is also expected to look into whether false statements, abuse of authority, or other potential crimes were committed by those involved in drafting or promoting the initial Russia-collusion claims.
As the investigation unfolds, both critics and supporters of the effort agree: the implications could be historic.
